GP & Executive Operations
Our Services
We identify where AI removes cost and where it quietly adds risk.
Every engagement begins with a scoping conversation. If a smaller package is the right starting point, we will say so.
Partners want one honest view of the firm: what is raised, what is deployable, where the risk sits. Most firms already hold that data. What they lack is a single agreed version of it, so the same question returns a different answer depending on who was asked and when. We help you build executive reporting that answers in plain language, cites every figure to the system it came from, and holds up when a partner challenges it at an operating committee. Where records disagree, we would rather show you the disagreement than average it away. Reconciling them is work we scope before any reporting is built.
Reporting That Holds Up
We start with the questions the partnership actually asks: how much dry powder is deployable once unfunded commitments and reserves are counted, where concentration has crept in across funds and vehicles, and which positions have moved since the last valuation. We build reporting that assembles those answers from the fund administrator, the accounting system and the portfolio records the firm already keeps, and puts the source and as-of date beside each figure.
We also build investment and advisory committee packs: a draft assembled from current records, with variances flagged and supporting documents attached, so the meeting starts from evidence rather than assembling it. The line of judgement sits at interpretation. A model can report that a figure has moved and where the movement came from. It cannot decide whether the movement is a problem, whether to hold or mark a position, or what to tell an LP. A named partner or finance lead signs off every pack before it leaves the firm.
dry powder and deployment view
investment committee pack preparation
cross-fund exposure reporting
portfolio early warning flags
advisory committee materials
Sequencing the Executive Layer
The Diagnostic is paid and time-boxed. We trace each figure a partner relies on back to where it originates, record where systems disagree and why, and mark the questions the firm cannot answer without a manual exercise. It ends with a written view of what can be reported reliably now, what needs reconciliation first, and what should stay a human judgement call.
The Pilot takes one recurring pack, usually the quarterly partner report or the investment committee template, gives it a named owner and a test it either passes or fails: less assembly work, and no figure nobody could defend. Build connects that pack to the systems of record, with review gates and an audit trail on every generated figure. Run covers monitoring, the periodic re-scope as new vehicles launch, and the governance evidence that the reporting is reviewed rather than trusted. If the Diagnostic finds the data will not support the reporting the partnership wants, we say so and scope the remediation instead.
Diagnostic: trace every figure a partner relies on back to its source
Pilot: one recurring pack, a named owner, and a test it passes or fails
Build: connect the pack to systems of record, with an audit trail on each figure
Run: monitoring, governance evidence, and re-scoping as new vehicles launch
